Twitter Thread Exposing Fish Fraud Is Both Eye-Opening & Revolting

We've got some seriously bad news for fish-lovers. According to a report from nonprofit Oceana, over 20% of 449 fish that they tested were mislabeled, exposing some pretty serious "fish fraud." This is a staggering percentage, especially when considering that less than 1% of fish is tested for fraud. There's a huge chance that the expensive fish you're ordering while dining out is cheap - or even, according to this related Twitter thread from a biology professor, dangerous. There are fish out there that will hurt you to eat. And, as @AwesomeBioTA's class discovered, some of this "fish" is almost too disgusting for words.

1.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA OH BOY OH BOY I just got the results back from my class' foray in sequencing fish samples. ARE YOU READY? They're a mind-bender. Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA 5d So on Friday my Molecular Bio students did a lab about fish fraud. Their Super Important Homework Assignment (TM) was to go out for sushi and take a small sample home in a ziploc bag (EAT THE REST. Wasting food is uncool).... Show this thread 4:23 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client

2.

fish fraud - Text - Dr.Jen M @AwesomeBioTA Josue sequenced some red snapper. I put money on that being tilapia and... was right. Someone owes me $5. His lab partner, Juanni, sequenced Atlantic Salmon. Comes back as Rainbow trout. Unsurprising. Not the same species AT ALL, but unsurprising. 4:26 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client >

3.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA David and Nicolas both sequenced what they thought was Steelhead trout (aka Rainbow trout). David's was smoked, Nic's not. Nic's was rainbow trout. David's was coho salmon. 4:28 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client

4.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBiOTA Reena sequenced what was labelled (on the box I bought at the grocery store, no less) lcelandic Cod (MSC- certified). It was. Thank God. Sydney sequenced what was labelled (again, ON THE BOX purchased at the grocery store) Pacific Cod. It was Atlantic Cod. (CRINGEEE!!!!! 4:31 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client

5.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA Jade sequenced what the sushi restaurant (who shall remain nameless...it's probably not their fault) called red tuna. IT WAS TILAPIA!!!! IIIIII 4:32 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client >

6.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA Moe sequenced one of the two samples (from different restaurants) labelled "white tuna". Often another name for albacore tuna. It was yellowfin tuna. (NOT the same species!! A trade upwards) 4:35 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client

7.

fish fraud - Text - Dr.Jen M @AwesomeBioTA Evalyne sequenced the other sample of "white tuna". That was the one that I brought in, that I theoretically would have eaten if I actually liked and ate "white tuna" (I think it's gross). It was escolar. THIS IS DANGEROUS. Can cause extreme gastrointestinal distress. 4:37 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client >

8.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA Last but not least of successful sample runs, we had one that makes my skin crawl. It was a sequence that came back with a bunch of "unknown bases" (a bit of cleaning up will help immensely) but I worked with what I had and ran it through the database. Was *supposed* to be Salmon 4:38 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client

9.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA This salmon was not from a restaurant, but was instead purchased from the seafood department of a local grocery store. Again, to remain nameless. This was purchased from a counter, someone reaches in and grabs the fish, puts it in a bag, sticks a sticker on it, pay by the pound. 4:39 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client >

10.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA Of a gene approximately 650 base pairs long, I was hoping to get a workable sequence of at least 500 base pairs. This one only had 200 clean pairs before I go through the file to improve the sequence generated. So short compared to expected of "working material". Ready? 4:40 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client

11.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA Body louse. I think I might vomit in my mouth a little. Thope this is a mistake. HOPE TO ANY GOD FROM ANY RELIGION that this is a mistake. I hope that this somehow becomes a fish sequence when I clean it up a bit. BUT BODY LOUSE. 4:42 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client >

12.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA This wasn't a piece of garbage from a market. This was from a "salmon fillet" that someone paid good money for, cut some off before they cooked it, put it in saran wrap & brought it in. BODY LOUSE Think about how much there must be in that sample to override fish DNA! 4:43 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client

13.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA Anyway, I don't know if any of my students are nearly as enthralled as l am about the results of this experiment. I'M THRILLED. 16 students, 13 decent bands on the gel. Of those, we had 9 with pretty decent sequences. THAT'S NOT BAD. Of those 9, TWO WERE LABELLED CORRECTLY. 4:46 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client >

14.

fish fraud - Text - Dr. Jen M @AwesomeBioTA So if you "are what you eat" and you like seafood? You have no idea what you are because nothing is labelled properly. If you want to know what you're eating? Make sure it's from a certified sustainable fishery. They know what they're fishing, and know what they're doing. 4:47 PM 4/5/19 Twitter Web Client

Submitted by:



from Memebase https://ift.tt/2yTe2eD

Post a Comment

0 Comments